From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-15 10:08:03
At 10:34 AM 8/15/2002, Neal D. Becker wrote:
>I think the choice of fstream.hpp for filesystem is going to cause a
>lot of confusion. There is already an <fstream>, and g++ as of 3.1
>still has <fstream.h>.
What would you suggest? Given that <boost/filesystem/fstream.hpp> is a
very thin wrapper of the <fstream> classes, the header name (and matching
namespace and class names) seemed appropriate to me.
But I'm certainly open to other suggestions.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk