Re: [boost] Re: 80% portable ptr<>

From: Larry Evans (jcampbell3_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-15 12:30:41

Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:

>"Larry Evans" <jcampbell3_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>  
>
>>Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Here is ptr<> nearly fully portable:
>>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/ptr/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I tried the previous ptr.h with both static ptr<T> in a short
>>test driver,  check_static.cpp, and in another .cpp file,
>>ptrT.cpp,  got 0 values for the get_type_id's of the
>>instances of the static ptr<T>'s in main.  When I
>>defined both ptr_ctti::s_size and the ptr_base<T>::s_id's
>>in separate files (following the one-defintion) rule,
>>everything worked fine.
>>    
>>
>
>What compiler are you using?  Because static members are like global
>variables and modifications should occur sequentially (i.e. when templates
>are instanciated).
>

[evansl_at_localhost evansl]$ g++ -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-mandrake-linux-gnu/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Mandrake Linux 8.2 2.96-0.76mdk)

I'll post the code to boost files so you can see yourself.