Boost logo

Boost :

From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-16 09:37:03


The point is that thread exceptions can not be rethrown intact.

----- Original Message -----
From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Sent: Thursday, 2002:August:15 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: Re: std::exception -- Re: Re: Re: Re:
Re:AttemptingresolutionofThreads&ExceptionsIssue

One of use is clearly confused here....
Change your example program as shown and tell me what happens.
At Thursday 2002/08/15 16:55, you wrote:
>Since the compiler always creates its own instance of an exception when you
>throw something, the following causes the invalid_argument to be sliced:
>
>
>#include <iostream>
>#include <stdexcept>
>
>int main () {
> try {
> try {
> throw std::invalid_argument ("argument is
invalid");
> }
> catch (std::exception& exception) {
> throw exception;

Change the above line to:
                 throw;

> }
> }
> catch (std::invalid_argument& exception) {
> std::cout << "invalid argument found" << std::endl;
> }
> catch (std::exception& exception) {
> std::cout << "generic std::exception found" << std::endl;
> }
>
> return 0;
>}
>
>This means that even with a valid std::exception& type caught from a
thread,
>it is impossible to have the user catch it as anything besides an
>std::exception*. However, this may make it trivial to migrate to using
>shared_ptrs of exceptions because the concrete exception types need not be
>known, thus, a wrapper can easily be written to rethrow exceptions as
>shared_ptrs.
>
>The other option is to have to have disperate catching semantics for calls
>to thread.join () and a non-threaded function. While the user can specify
>that the thread supports std::exception&, they will have to catch an
>std::exception* (the user isn't responsible for deleting it) -- this may or
>may not be acceptable.
[deleted]
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk