From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-18 08:06:29
"Bo Persson" <bop2_at_[hidden]> writes:
| "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr_at_[hidden]> skrev i meddelandet
| > Some days ago, someone was wondering on this list (sorry, I can't find
| > the message off hand) whether the following construct
| > typedef reverse_iterator<T> reverse_iterator;
| > were valid or not and reported that one of his compiler rejected it.
| Yes, but
| typedef std::reverse_iterator<T> reverse_iterator;
| is accepted.
Yes, that is right as far the above doesn't happen in std:: and
namespaces that use std::.
| > His compiler was right; somewhere, the standard says
| > 3.3/4
| > Given a set of declarations in a single declarative region, each of
| > which specifies the same unqualified name,
| Note: "unqualified name"
Yes, with the key phrase "in a single declarative region".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk