From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-19 11:13:34
From: "John Maddock" <jm_at_[hidden]>
> > From: "John Maddock" <jm_at_[hidden]>
> > >
> > > On the issue of exception classes: why would you think that the
> > > class could possibly use a different calling convention to the base
> > > for a virtual function?
> > The problem is that standard-conforming code (a class that derives from
> > std::exception) does not compile under bcc 5.5.1 -ps.
> Accepted, but -ps is a non standard-conforming calling convention, so
> what do you expect?
I expect standard-conforming code to compile. The standard says nothing
about -ps being nonstandard.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk