From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-19 14:33:36
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> There are cases where having two ways of doing something makes no
> sense. But we shouldn't reject it out-of-hand. I hope the acceptance of
> MPL by Boost won't discourage others from submitting a more minimalist
How many alternative libraries have been submitted for a topic that is
already covered by a Boost library?
This is a roundabout way to say that it _will_ discourage others. I say
nothing about this being good or bad, and nothing about MPL in particular.
It's just that "competition" within Boost is virtually nonexistant.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk