RE: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries [was MPL containers and algorithms]

From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-19 19:08:44

I, for one, would be happy to see the common subset of those three
libraries merge into Bind, instead of "reimplementing the wheel"...

/David

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Douglas Paul Gregor
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:30 PM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries [was MPL
containers and algorithms]

On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Peter Dimov wrote:
> How many alternative libraries have been submitted for a topic that is
> already covered by a Boost library?
>
> This is a roundabout way to say that it _will_ discourage others. I
say
> nothing about this being good or bad, and nothing about MPL in
particular.
> It's just that "competition" within Boost is virtually nonexistant.

Compose/Bind/Lambda?

        Doug

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost