Re: [boost] Pascal-like Set Class

From: spamjunk (spamjunk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-20 18:02:57

I'm sorry, but I don't own that one.

On Tuesday 20 August 2002 06:21 pm, Chuck Allison wrote:
> Is Visual C++ .NET not a candidate?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <spamjunk_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:25 PM
> Subject: [boost] Pascal-like Set Class
>
> > Hello all:
> >
> > I have received the go-ahead from my employer to submit the code for the
>
> set
>
> > class.  I hope to have it in proper shape for an initial peer review in
>
> one
>
> > week.  I need to "Boostify" it, especially for portability.  Currently,
>
> the only
>
> > compiler I have that will build for is GCC 3.1 on Linux (DJGPP currently
>
> gives
>
> > me link errors).  I would like to get it working on VC 6.0 SP5 (and maybe
>
> BCC
>
> > 5.5 or GCC 3.95.x?), though I know that the meta-template code that
>
> creates the
>
> > compile-time constants will never work with Visual C++ as it doesn't
>
> support
>
> > partial specialization.  Which is too bad, for I think VC 6's optimizer
> > is simply amazing.  Any compiler preferences?  Any suggestions for an
> > actual class/library name?
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > pop-server.stny.rr.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
>
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost