|
|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-21 07:54:59
From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
> Now, why did we have to go and define the language that way?
> Function-style casts weren't part of 'C', were they?
No, but they were part of C++ "1.0", and probably part of "C with classes"
too, long before templates and new style casts. Somehow they never got
fixed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk