
Boost : 
From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 20020822 10:57:30
At Thursday 2002/08/22 01:23, you wrote:
>Maxim Shemanarev writes:
> > > If the committee is seriously considering ways to handle stuff, how
> about
> > > dealing with the two results returned by almost every integer divide
> > > instruction... quotient and remainder.
> >
> > Right. That's another thing. But in this case if you write x=a/b; y=a%b; a
> > compiler at least *can try* to optimize this. In case of x*a/b it cannot
> > because it's not allowed to!
>
>Everyone is forgetting that integer overflow on signed types results in
>undefined behaviour.
This is an artifact of the language definition (a poor one, IMO). When _I_
learned multiplication (way back when I was 6 or 7) I noticed pretty quick
that if I multiplied a n digit number by an m digit number I _might_ get an
m+n digit number. The first several computers I worked on always produced
a "two word" product from two "one word" operands. I was somewhat
disappointed to learn that the HLL's all seemed to ignore this "basic fact"
of mathematics. <shrug> it's what we're stuck with, tho I still consider
it mostly intellectual laziness that led to it. Especially with strongly
typed languages now.
>Since the only case in which you need the intermediate
>result to be larger than int is where (x*a) overflows, this expression
>yields undefined behaviour in such cases. The upshot of this is that a
>compiler is permitted (as an extension) to _define_ such behaviour, and ensure
>that x*a/b always yields the mathematically correct result if the final result
>fits in an int. Obviously, if the final result doesn't fit in an int, you
>still have overflow (e.g. INT_MAX*INT_MAX/1), but this actually allows
>implementations to define the result of a*b/c as the mathematically
>correct answer where the final answer is in range.
allowing isn't the same as mandating
>Anthony
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP DH fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk