From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-22 11:30:11
At Thursday 2002/08/22 03:44, you wrote:
> >From: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]>
> > At Wednesday 2002/08/21 15:23, you wrote:
> > >
> > >a discussion on an STLport forum triggered a little discussion on
> > >lexical_cast. I believe that current implementation has a couple of
> > >
> > I agree here. I've often thought that boost::lexical_cast<std::string>()
> > should be a special case that doesn't to the >> afterwards, just swap the
> > buffer (might as well go for speed while we're at it).
>That sounds like a good idea. How do you do swap the buffer for
>std::stringstream and std::string?
you don't, tho I was stunned to see compile and execute (assume using
namespace std here):
ost << 5 << " abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
cout << widget << endl;
do what I hoped...
cout << ost.str() << endl;
afterwards still had the original buffer, so I guess str() returns a
constructed copy of the buffer;
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk