Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-23 08:16:19

Next message: Andrew Koenig: "Re: [boost] iterator::operator[]"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "[boost] iterator::operator[]"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "[boost] iterator::operator[]"
Next in thread: Andrew Koenig: "Re: [boost] iterator::operator[]"

From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>

> FWIW, after some days of thinking, I am now convinced that the operator[]
> requirement for random access iterators is a defect. Iterators don't need
> [], containers do.

That's what I always thought.
-----------------------------------------------------------
David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Andrew Koenig: "Re: [boost] iterator::operator[]"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "[boost] iterator::operator[]"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "[boost] iterator::operator[]"
Next in thread: Andrew Koenig: "Re: [boost] iterator::operator[]"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk