Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Chris Trengove (trengove_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-24 17:28:04

Next message: spamjunk: "Re: [boost] Implementation/code convention question"
Previous message: Alexander Terekhov: "[boost] Re: Boost.threads: interthread exceptionconveyance"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Re: Misc Borland problems"

> I haven't noticed any fixes that effect boost, although Kylix does at
least
> support long long (and in integral constant expressions as well!).
>

I have attempted to run all the compiler tests on BCC 0x561, and it appears
that BOOST_NO_MEMBER_FUNCTION_SPECIALIZATIONS now fails (the compiler
generates an assertion on the test file), but we now have
BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG and BOOST_HAS_STDINT.

Chris

Next message: spamjunk: "Re: [boost] Implementation/code convention question"
Previous message: Alexander Terekhov: "[boost] Re: Boost.threads: interthread exceptionconveyance"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Re: Misc Borland problems"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk