[boost] Re: Re: (boost) Re: A pure C/C++ question

From: Hillel Y. Sims (hsims_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-28 15:57:57

"Anthony Williams" <anthwil_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:3csznzv0.fsf_at_nortelnetworks.com...
> In the case of undefined behaviour, all bets are off, and the C++ compiler
can
> do what it likes. However, if it can do something useful, then it makes
sense
> to do so.

Just a random observation.. Sometimes it feels like there are a
disconcertingly large number of instances of explicitly-mandated "undefined
behavior" or "ill-formed, no diagnostic required" (my new favorite phrase of
the day, cf 14.7.3.6...) in C++...

hys

--
Hillel Y. Sims
FactSet Research Systems
hsims AT factset.com