From: Hillel Y. Sims (hsims_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-28 15:57:57
"Anthony Williams" <anthwil_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> In the case of undefined behaviour, all bets are off, and the C++ compiler
> do what it likes. However, if it can do something useful, then it makes
> to do so.
Just a random observation.. Sometimes it feels like there are a
disconcertingly large number of instances of explicitly-mandated "undefined
behavior" or "ill-formed, no diagnostic required" (my new favorite phrase of
the day, cf 18.104.22.168...) in C++...
-- Hillel Y. Sims FactSet Research Systems hsims AT factset.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk