RE: [boost] wachamacallit set

From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-28 22:09:07

Regarding the name: there are programmers that do not go to bed with a
tool without knowing its name.

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Joel de Guzman
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:55 PM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] wachamacallit set

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "spamjunk" <spamjunk_at_[hidden]>

> Wow, so much over a name.  Any comments on the actual code?  How's the

> interface?
> 
> Rich

It's the bicycle shed syndrome :-)

--As I said, I liked the enum interface. I'm not particularly fond of
the min-max bounds requirement though but I guess there's no way around
that?

--Joel

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost