RE: [boost] Re: 1.29.0 Status

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-29 14:58:32

At 01:54 PM 8/29/2002, Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:

 >I implemented "included" headers and committed them.
 >
 >I implemented minimal test header. I am testing it. Unfortunately I am
 >upgrading my computer at the moment also and having some problems with 
it,
 >so I needed to postpone committing and announcing this. I should be done 
by
 >the end of long week-end.

Great! That should be fine, schedule wise.

We need to be sure that each of the major use scenarios is being tested by 
the status/Jamfile.  If you could make sure of that, it would be 
helpful.  Might be a good idea to add a comment for each of these tests in 
the Jamfile so maintainers will know that the test is being done 
deliberately with/without included headers, or whatever, to ensure full 
test coverage.

 >Boost.Test documentation is pretty much usable. There are several topics
 >that still missing, but I hope it would not be a show stopper.

Missing important functionality would be a show stopper, but not minor docs 
issues.  You might have a chance to fix those anyhow, depending on the 
schedule for some other libs.

--Beman