|
Boost : |
From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-30 14:35:39
On Thursday 29 August 2002 05:32 am, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
> So, this any is more flexible because dynamic_cast can be used to cast from
> placeholder to T even if T is not polymorphic:
> struct A {};
> struct B : A {};
> placeholder * p = new holder<B>(B());
> A * a = dynamic_cast<A *>(p);
> assert(a);
How does this affect the use of any (from a user's point-of-view)? While I'd
agree that this formulation is easier on the implementation side (although
potentially less efficient due to the use of multiple inheritance), I don't
see how it affects the interface to 'any'? Does it make 'any' more useful?
Doug
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk