Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-30 15:21:39

Next message: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: set class"
Previous message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [Libcwd-devel] libcwd and Boost"
In reply to: Stephen Nutt: "[boost] Re: Why no long long support in integer::int_t?"
Next in thread: Stephen Nutt: "Re: [boost] Re: Why no long long support in integer::int_t?"
Reply: Stephen Nutt: "Re: [boost] Re: Why no long long support in integer::int_t?"

> > I wish boost::int_t would support long long. Now it is restricted to
> > long. Is there any good reason for this restriction?
>
> I'm sorry, I can't find a response to this. Neal, did you find a clean
> solution as I also need support for long long.

Use boost::int64_t.

Jeff

Next message: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: set class"
Previous message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [Libcwd-devel] libcwd and Boost"
In reply to: Stephen Nutt: "[boost] Re: Why no long long support in integer::int_t?"
Next in thread: Stephen Nutt: "Re: [boost] Re: Why no long long support in integer::int_t?"
Reply: Stephen Nutt: "Re: [boost] Re: Why no long long support in integer::int_t?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk