Re: [boost] Re: set class

From: spamjunk (spamjunk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-30 15:58:58

I don't particularly care for bag either.  Are "domain" and
"constrained_set" still on the table?  I don't mind those.

Is there something wrong with plain old "int_set"?  The typical argument I
would expect from the group is that it don't convey any difference from
set<int>.  But think that it does tell you that this class is optimized for
int type and its "relatives".

Rich

----- Original Message -----
From: "David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 4:38 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: set class

> "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:akoh24$npk$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> >
> > "Greg Colvin" <Gregory.Colvin_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > news:5.1.1.6.2.20020830130145.02a48df0_at_rgmgitmail.oraclecorp.com...
> > > I vote for "bag".
> > >
> > Gee! You've just took it out of my mouth! :-)
>
> You had a bag in your mouth?  How odd. ;)  Seriously, though, when I
> see 'bag', I read 'heterogenous container', not 'set'.  Anyone else have
> that problem?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>