Re: [boost] date_time operators [was Interval Library -- UsingIntervalfor Dates/Times ]

From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-03 15:37:46

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]>

> > I'm still wondering why date_time does not support destructive
> > update such as +=. Is there a reason why this is deliberately left out?
> 
> Does lazyness count as deliberate?  

Aha! I thought that since it went through a formal review, the
design was deliberate :-). 

> > Also, when will duration support D * N, where N is a number?
> > (as printed in the documentation)
> 
> Amazingly it is also in the 'online' documentation ;-)  I'll 
> try and fix this in the next day or so.

Cool! I'm sure that this will be an easy fix :)
Pardon my pestering and nudging...

--Joel

PS> Thanks for supporting the default 64 bit computations! 
Works well :)