|
|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-05 15:23:32
From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
> Wow! That's a huge change. What about just using my dependent<> trick and
> making operator[] into a template member function instead?
What about just removing operator[] to see if anyone notices? :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk