Re: [boost] Re: Re: Finite state machine requirements

From: Joel Young (jdy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-05 19:25:12

Sorry,

I won't be much help on this.  I have handcoded FSM a couple of times
for protocols and financial systems and I would like a nice clean
boostified FSM system to have in my backback, but I just can't
contribute.  :-(

I shouldn't even be talking about this interval stuff, but interval
time models used to be my life...

Joel
--------
From: "Andreas Huber" <spam2002_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 01:47:08 +0200
  To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subj: [boost] Re: Re: Finite state machine requirements

Joel,

You (I assume boost user) are one of a handful of people who have expressed
interest here but no one so far provided feedback on the design of the
proposed framework. I'm relatively new to FSMs (1.5 years of heavy exposure)
so I'd need at least two fairly experienced FSM profs to critique the
framework before I would even dare to carry on and eventually submit to
boost.

Regards,

Andreas