|
Boost : |
From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-06 10:38:11
On Friday 06 September 2002 11:27 am, David Bergman wrote:
> Please, do not do this to the poor '==', it did not deserve to be
> irreflexive ;-)
By irreflexive, do you mean 'not reflexive' or 'possibly not reflexive'? I'm
not convinced that applying the word 'reflexive' to a 3-state relation makes
any sense.
Doug
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk