From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-06 16:17:21
Sylvain Pion <pion_at_[hidden]> writes:
| On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:25:32PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | But there will be no _default_ order, because there is no suitable default !
| > No suitable default for *exactly what*?
| Suitable for the _primary_ usage of intervals, i.e. controlling roundoff
| errors, not serving as keys in ordered containers.
You said you can't find a default hat serves well *your* pirmary use.
That is fine. Just don't use the default if it were provided. Other
people find other uses for which the mentioned default serves well
(and integrate smoothly in the containing libary general framework).
There is no reason to give them that default.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk