|
Boost : |
From: Carl Daniel (cpdaniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-06 17:43:26
"Douglas Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:200209061734.06245.gregod_at_cs.rpi.edu...
> I propose that we:
> 1) Remove comparison policies _in their current form_
> 2) Create a default comparison semantics that makes interval<T> a
numeric
> type that will work well in generic functions (it should throw if rounding
> errors cause a comparison to be indeterminate)
> 3) Allow other comparison semantics to override the default semantics
within
> a particular scope
I like it!
-cd
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk