From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-07 09:42:13
Guillaume Melquiond <gmelquio_at_[hidden]> writes:
| No, I don't read too much into the Standard.
because the Standard decided the only interesting types are float,
double and long double
which is untrue.
| I just find unusable a part
| of a library whose behavior is not only "unspecified" by the Standard but
| also "not required to [be] documented" by the implementation.
Oh, "unspecifed" means all that. But it is not the same as "undefined
behaviour". It is wording to say that it is up to the implementation
to document whether it supports a particular extension. Give it a
little bit of thought.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk