Boost logo

Boost :

From: Larry Evans (jcampbell3_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-07 11:39:39

Larry Evans wrote:

> Greg Colvin wrote:
> Anyway, the shared_ptr and shared_count also were modified to allow
> this. I could
> post these if you want, or I could give further explanation. I
> realize this is kinda sketchy,
> but let me know and I try and be clearer.
Another modification I was thinking of was using the allocator from the
collector of cmm (
 I figured
it could be used to enumerate all the allocated objects (much like
through cyclic_ptr's recycler's handles). In addition, since this is a
conservative collector,
it would be easy to check for any leaks. What do you think? Also, it
could be used
to eliminate the need for a weak_ptr count (as mentioned in my earlier
post about "conserve+
shared_ptr advantages.")

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at