[boost] Re: boost paths

From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-11 10:37:01

You might want to consider more enforcement of that rule so using boost::X
is more intuitive.

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Dimov
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Sent: Wednesday, 2002:September:11 7:32
Subject: Re: boost paths

From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> Why is Boost.Function included with boost/function.hpp, even though there
is
> a boost/function/ directory, but tuples are boost/tuple/tuple.hpp?

There is no clear-cut policy on subdirectories, but the rule most of us use
is: boost/X.hpp defines boost::X.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost