From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-11 10:37:01
You might want to consider more enforcement of that rule so using boost::X
is more intuitive.
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Dimov
Sent: Wednesday, 2002:September:11 7:32
Subject: Re: boost paths
From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> Why is Boost.Function included with boost/function.hpp, even though there
> a boost/function/ directory, but tuples are boost/tuple/tuple.hpp?
There is no clear-cut policy on subdirectories, but the rule most of us use
is: boost/X.hpp defines boost::X.
Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk