From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-13 18:41:02
A destructor is perfectly apt for cleanup. There's no reason to introduce
dangling thread instances. There will be a 1-to-1 mapping of thread objects
to thread resources.
----- Original Message -----
From: Hillel Y. Sims
Sent: Friday, 2002:September:13 18:28
Subject: Re: Boost.Thread
"Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> When return values enter the picture, join needs to become the return
> accessor, allowed to be called more than once
If this is the case, how would the thread library know when to finally clean
up the finished thread's resources?
-- Hillel Y. Sims FactSet Research Systems hsims AT factset.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk