[boost] Re: Boost.Thread

From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-13 18:41:02

A destructor is perfectly apt for cleanup. There's no reason to introduce
dangling thread instances. There will be a 1-to-1 mapping of thread objects
to thread resources.

----- Original Message -----
From: Hillel Y. Sims
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Sent: Friday, 2002:September:13 18:28
Subject: Re: Boost.Thread

"Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:014f01c25a8f$605ebd80$1800000a_at_soy...
> When return values enter the picture, join needs to become the return
value
> accessor, allowed to be called more than once

If this is the case, how would the thread library know when to finally clean
up the finished thread's resources?

hys

--
Hillel Y. Sims
FactSet Research Systems
hsims AT factset.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost