Re: [boost] Re: 1.29.0?

From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-17 16:56:45

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>

> > Also, I haven't understood Mr. Abrahams idea about a boost release
> > being "something available". I think we should not forget that when
> > boost releases there will certainly be a lot of people that will start
> > using the released code. If the goal is only to have the code
> > available for the committee why not creating e.g. a "committee
> > sandbox" instead of binding people with something released in a hurry
> > and, above all, not (expressly) for their use?
>
> This is out of context. 1.29.0 was supposed to go out a month ago. That's
> the problem that is being discussed.

This is partly because of me.  I had to stabilize the preprocessor library in on
relatively short notice, and several other library's are using it, so they were
waiting for me.

Paul Mensonides