[boost] Re: question on static data members of class templates

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-18 07:07:06

Gennaro Prota wrote:
> 
> Uh? Moves?? This is exactly what DR 48 is for. The resolution is part

Are you sure about this? I looked at

http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#48

and this doesn't seem to be the DR you are refering to.

> of the TC1 and without that not even our BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT would
> be correct.
> 
> Genny.
> 

Markus