From: Rozental, Gennadiy (Gennadiy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-19 13:09:22
> Much of the "explosion" with type_traits is due to moving to granular
> headers, which means that ultimately users of type_traits can end up
> depening on less actual code. This is one of those benchmarks
> where raw
> numbers are easily misinterpreted.
In this sence I think it does not worth analizing composing headers like
type_traits.hpp, function.hpp, smart_ptr.hpp on dependencies (as any in-lib
More interestingly would be to know inter-library dependencies. It will be
very simple and easy ot analyze graph.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk