From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-19 13:53:25
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 02:11 PM, Iain K.Hanson wrote:
> The only interesting dependacies imho are which libraries are used i.e.
Agreed. These two:
are throwing up a red flag with me. The type traits library was
intended to be "fundamental" in the sense that it provided a base upon
which other libs could be built without dragging in a lot of other
stuff. I've never before envisioned it as "middle-ware".
Do either of mpl or preprocessor depend on type traits? What is the
motivation for the dependence of type traits on mpl and preprocessor?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk