From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-20 08:02:50
David Abrahams wrote:
> From: "John Maddock" <john_maddock_at_[hidden]>
>>The following comments are mostly based on a review of the filesys lib
>>Let me say up front that I like the library and think that it should be
>>accepted into boost.
>>I don't really like the operator << usage, personally I would have
>>path operator+(const path&, const path&);
> Or maybe:
> path::operator/=(const path&);
> path operator/(const path&, const path&);
> Too cute? I rather like it.
Hmm... it too thought "/" is nice. Was it ever considered, Beman?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk