Re: [boost] More scoped_ptr ruminations

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-21 10:57:07

From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
> > A good idea, although the correct test is
'has_virtual_destructor<Base>',
> I
> > think.
>
> Yes, but we don't know how to implement that, do we?

Yep. Isn't one of the goals of the type_traits library/extension proposal to
provide things that we can't implement, like has_trivial_destructor or
is_POD?