From: Kresimir Fresl (fresl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-22 10:19:57
Benedikt Weber wrote:
> [...] So it would, may be, better to use vector<size_t>
> for the bit-reversed indices and not use the notational convenience of
> valarray (indirect_array).
Maybe vector<> and vector_indirect<> from boost::numeric::ublas
can be used. Unfortunately, it vector_indirect<> not documented yet.
Definition is in boost/numeric/ublas/vector_proxy.hpp.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk