Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-22 12:45:36

I've just been preparing class materials on Boost.Function, and it occurred
to me that the use of the term "compatible" in the documentation could be
confusing. On the one hand, it's used to describe which functions and
function objects can be implicitly converted to function<T> objects (I like
this one). On the other hand, it's used to describe the old syntax
functionNN<result, arg1, arg2,... argNN> (I don't like this one). Could we
try something else, like "portable" for the second usage?


           David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave_at_[hidden] *

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at