Re: [boost] More on is_stateless<>

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-23 09:04:29

From: "Douglas Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]>
>
> Well, if the type were actually stateless, it wouldn't matter if we stored
a
> copy or not. But the definition of stateless doesn't account for this type
of
> location-dependence, so Function is wrong here.

is_stateless (def): all instances of the type are equivalent.