Re: [boost] status/Jamfile

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-25 13:12:39

[2002-09-25] David Abrahams wrote:

>From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
>
>
>> [2002-09-25] Rene Rivera wrote:
>>
>> >[2002-09-25] John Maddock wrote:
>> >
>> >>and on linux it's complaining that file
>> >>"<borland><*><cxxflags>-w-8026 -w-8027 -w-8057 -w-8084 -w-8092" doesn't
>> >>exist and it doesn't know how to build it !
>> >
>> >Never mind my previous message... I thought you where refering to the
>> >RC_1_29_0 branch. I see some of those errors in the main trunk now...
>> >investigating.
>>
>> OK it's fixed in the RC_1_29_0 branch. Joerg seems to have forgotten the
>> ARGS argument to the run rules in the uBLAS tests. As for the fix in the
>> main trunk... If it's needed now someone else will have to do that as
>there
>> are other changes from the RC branch that I don't know if they should, or
>> how, be merge in. Or we just wait for the release merge.
>
>Uhh, I thought the problems were only in the trunk?

I was wrong ;-) It was on both, just didn't look closely enough.

>A cygwin built bjam doesn't work for me, but then IIRC it has never worked
>for me.
>
>Is it possible that I broke the unix/cygwin build of bjam when I checked
>int Markus' patch for AIX? Seems doubtful; it looks like it was restricted
>to just archive scanning stuff.

No Boost.Build problems, just the misuse of the test "run" rule by Joerg.

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]