From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-27 09:45:26
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:48:00 +0200, Björn Karlsson
>If you need to check for the availability of numeric_limits, that supposedly
>means that you intend to use it; and there's already a working solution in
>place, namely boost/limits.hpp. As it already does The Right Thing, there's
>no need to ever check for BOOST_NO_LIMITS.
>As I didn't write those notes, this is only my interpretation, of course.
Yes, I just wondered if there was some odd reason behind that wording.
Consider that it doesn't say "there's no need to check", it
peremptorily says "never check", which is quite different ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk