[boost] Re: BOOST TEST documentation: Missing link

From: Alisdair Meredith (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-29 14:58:43

For a consumer product, I would go with <2>
As the target is developers, I would prefer <1>

We are more understanding about 'not implemented/documented' features,
but more picky about errors!

AlisdairM

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> 
> "Alisdair Meredith" <alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:3D971E15.C3972260_at_uk.renaultf1.com...
> > At the top of the Unit Test Framework page there is an in-page link to
> > 'The Framework Extensions' however this section does not exist (yet)
> I did not plan to add the extensions description page for this release.
> I could:
> 1. Add "To be supplied page"
> 2. Remove the link
> 3. Leave as is: it should not bother you too much.
> 
> What would you prefer?
> 
> Gennadiy.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

-- 
AlisdairM
Team Thai Kingdom