From: Alisdair Meredith (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-29 14:58:43
For a consumer product, I would go with <2>
As the target is developers, I would prefer <1>
We are more understanding about 'not implemented/documented' features,
but more picky about errors!
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Alisdair Meredith" <alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > At the top of the Unit Test Framework page there is an in-page link to
> > 'The Framework Extensions' however this section does not exist (yet)
> I did not plan to add the extensions description page for this release.
> I could:
> 1. Add "To be supplied page"
> 2. Remove the link
> 3. Leave as is: it should not bother you too much.
> What would you prefer?
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- AlisdairM Team Thai Kingdom
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk