RE: [boost] Re: [date_time] Missing definition fordate_names_put::id?

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-30 12:03:38

> > > Hmm, there isn't any chance that you might consider supplying a
> > > definition in the header file?
> > 
> > Then we are going to have a multiple definition problem, no?
> > 
> 
> No, because it's a static data member of a class template and 3.2(5)
> explicitely allows this.

Unfortunately my quick test indicates that it will be a problem. When
I moved the code to boost/date_time/gregorian/greg_facet.hpp I got
multiple definition errors on the link using gcc 3.1.

Jeff