From: Terje Slettebø (tslettebo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-01 06:56:40
>From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>From: "Terje Slettebø" <tslettebo_at_[hidden]>
>> If this is the case, what about the SGI STL/STLPort extensions to STL? Is
>> the clause about undefined behaviour to guard against possibly
>> perhaps (which SGI STL/STLPort may handle, but where an additional
>> may not guard against)?
>You have to do a little word-dance in your head and accept these libraries
>as "part of the implementation", or the behavior is totally undefined.
>Boost is not trying to be part of the implementation. Too much
Not to mention that Boost would then have to implement the entire standard
library, as well. :) Or have a specific standard library to go with it.
Thanks for the replies.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk