[boost] Re: Re: [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argument

From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-02 15:15:28

As I said, there is abiguity, and now a superfluous class that provides no
functional benefit.

"Larry Evans" <jcampbell3_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:3D9B3E08.70909_at_prodigy.net...
> Eric Woodruff wrote:
>
> >shared_ptr_const is abiguous as to whether it is analagous to
shared_ptr<T>
> >const or shared_ptr<T const>.
> >
> >
> It's analagous to shared_ptr<T const>.  The Scott Meyers reference
> should make
> this clearer.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>