From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippeb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-03 10:03:01
"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > Would this smart pointer be smart enough to be added to the next
> > version of Boost?
> If you think it's ready, ask for a formal review. You will help yourself
> considerably, however, if you write a robust test program and
> documentation, consistent with other Boost libraries. Take a look at
> the Boost.Test library to help you write the tests.
I'm ready in one hand, but on the other garbage collection is not yet. I'm
still persuated consecutive deallocations could be optimized also but I do
not know the best way to implement it.
What about the others?
Philippe A. Bouchard
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk