|
Boost : |
From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-03 13:11:55
"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:4034600A4760D411B8720001031D84FB0109648F_at_postoffice.office.meta...
> [...]
> Well, given that, apparently, Borland fails on the following code as well,
I
> don't think there is much we can do about the bug in general:
I guess I get to try to strip down the problem to its bare essentials and
file a bug report. Fun.
> [...]
> But here's a workaround for your particular example:
> [...]
> , this_type&
> , this_type const&
> [...]
Excellent! It's always a bit embarrassing when the obvious eludes me.
Dave
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk