[boost] Re: Re: No more tree_traits<> dependencies under placed_ptr<>

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-03 17:07:40

"Larry Evans" <jcampbell3_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:3D9CBAFE.2080500_at_prodigy.net...
> [...]
> I'll be happy to resurrect the code, but I'd first like some
> feedback on whether there's agreement on the merits of
> ip_offset_iterator vs. ip_assign_op_switch.  I'll also be happy
> to write a short user's guide on how to use ip_offset_iterator,
> if booster's find reading the code too daunting (Maddock actually
> asked me to do that way back for the old ip method, but I never
> got around to it).

Frankly, I don't know much about the details of collecting or breaking
cycles, so I would find a user's guide/tutorial quite helpful in evaluating
your proposal.  At this point, there are probably a few people like me
who simply can't make any intelligent comments on it. ;)

Dave