RE: [boost] Re: [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argumen t

From: Schoenborn, Oliver (Oliver.Schoenborn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-04 08:01:55

> "Larry Evans" <jcampbell3_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:3D9CC940.3050609_at_prodigy.net...
> > [...]
> > I think its close to perfect if not perfect!  This is better than
> > Meyer's solution.  Maybe Meyers didn't have
> > a compiler that could specialize on `const T` and `T`.
> 
> BTW, it's not my idea!  It's Oliver Schoenborn's (or
> whosever he got it from)...just in case there was any bit of 
> confusion over that.

Indeed, though I couldn't say if other people haven't thought of it too, of
course :>

Oliver