Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-04 11:10:22

Next message: Schoenborn, Oliver: "RE: [boost] Re: [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argumen t"
Previous message: Victor A. Wagner, Jr.: "Re: [boost] Re: Basic guarantee and synchronized multiple updates."
In reply to: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] Re: [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argumen t"
Next in thread: Schoenborn, Oliver: "RE: [boost] Re: [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argumen t"

"Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:200210041802.03242.witt_at_ive.uni-hannover.de...
> If it does not behave like a pointer it should not be named pointer.
>
> - --Thomas

-OR- it should at least have its shortcomings well documented, citing
language issues.

Next message: Schoenborn, Oliver: "RE: [boost] Re: [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argumen t"
Previous message: Victor A. Wagner, Jr.: "Re: [boost] Re: Basic guarantee and synchronized multiple updates."
In reply to: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] Re: [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argumen t"
Next in thread: Schoenborn, Oliver: "RE: [boost] Re: [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argumen t"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk