RE: [boost] Re: Re: refactoring type traits tests

From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-08 13:33:33

>  >I'm saying that the concept of expected failure is flawed (and yes I
know 
>  >put them in there in the first place!), basically using expected
failures 
> > in this way is just rigging the the tests so that they succeed.  It
doesn't
>  >get the information back to the end user IMO. 
>
>  Agree strongly.
> 
> Notice that for compiler warnings, the new regression test 
> can optionally 
> report them, with a link from the status table.
> 
> Maybe for Boost.Test (in the context of the regression tests) 
> we need the 
> same sort of ability.  That would give the end user the 
> information John is 
> talking about above.
> 
> Something to think about...
> 
> --Eman

>From what I view it does. Use the detailed testing report and you will get
the information required.

Gennadiy.